For Hausford
with reference to
I entries and interpretation of Sect 34 of
1862.
The Chief Justice may
at his
discretion (M.79
from time to time
to be tried when the purpose of the Summing Court is such that cases under the power
Cannot be tried.
point him by sect. 34. But it could not have
this in
been intended - and why then by the
A
preamble (which
direct causes
the makers
have been called "a key to open the mind of
the Act the chiefs which they intended to redress")
at any time when he wanted to know that the CT, could
my
habent, call upon the Summing Judge to sit for
June.
of harmless, from some
this in what is true has practically
owing to the owing This is not to relieve the Chief Justice
of his Judicial Duty
but formally such duties.
NTR
25.5.69
it is clear that
Mr. A. Robinson took the law as it was
taken.
incepote / 5072
2022 17x) Mu
Law no reason & entreaten
matter which-
Mr. H
incter &
5050 Strong Kong..
I should inform the
Governor in reply to this despatch, that Lord Granville had carefully considered the various questions raised by it, and that he approved of his decision with respect to the refusal of vacation applied for by Mr. Imale, on full salary,
out that,
first of all point
that, while all
regulations
as
analysts of to vacation and leaves of absence
Fort. L
must be held to be subject to the requirements of the Public Service, it is denied that the rule laid down in Art:133
Art 133 of the Colonial Regulations, "under which Mr. Imate asks for 4 months vacation (with a month extra) on full salary,
applies only to Civil Officers, and that as a Judicial Functionary the only vacation which he can claim is for the period during
which his Courts do not sit.
In the next place it appears
that
Fir Hausford
with is launcepte
I entries apree interprctation of Lect 34 of
1862.0
The Chief portice may
his
inriance M.79
Kok time to time
to be tried when the pufe of the Summing tout suck that puss under the powen
Cacan we tried 5
poin him by seet. 34- But it could not have
this in
been intended - and why them by the
A
preamble (which
direct causes
the maken
her been called "a key to open the muride of
the Act the win chiefs which they intended to redress")
at any time when he wanted to Krew that the CT, comed
to
my
habent, call upon the Summing Judge to sit for
Jone.
of horniess, from som
this in what is Tuale has practically
owing to the owing This in not to relien the chipulare
of his Judicial Duter
het formall such duties.
NTR
25.5.69
uimen
Mit he allowed to look dehors an Act, it is clear that
Wir A. Robinson took the Javen new other hee any was
taken 5
овый Ранн
incepote / 5072 1+K
2022 17x) Mu
Jaw no reason & entreten
matter wh
pothigh-
Mt H
incter &
5050 Stong Kong..
I should inform the
93
Governa in reply to this despatch, that Lord Granville had carefully Corsidered the various questions raised by it, and that he [approved] of his decision with respect to the refusal of vacation applied for ly h. Imale, on full salary,
out that,
Ishmed pist of all point
that, while all
regulations
ao
analyts of to vacation and leaves of absence
Fort. L
must be held to be sufest to the I d th
it is den! requirements of the Public Levice, th to have the rule laid down in Art:133
Art 133 of the for as peli Colonial Regulations, "under which ho. Imate asks for 4 months racation Goo? (with a mouth extra) on full salary,
applies only to Civil Officers, and that as a Judicial Formationary the only vacation which he can claim is for the period during
which his Courts do not eit.
In the next place it appears
that
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.